News
The cultural funding system in the Netherlands
Published: Oct 24, 2007 - 03:55 PM
A famous Dutch maxim propounded in 1862 by the liberal Prime Minister Thorbecke
that, ‘The government is not a judge of science or art’, established the precedent to
keep state officials from expressing any opinion on the content of the arts and sciences
or deciding what direction they should take. Over 150 years later this principle
is still in effect as can be seen by the contemporary government’s practice of leaving
judgments on the content of art and culture to outside advisory bodies.
There has always been broad consensus that government support for culture is legitimate,
based on the desirability of a general cultural climate in which individual freedom
of expression, in the broadest sense, is paramount.
Another subject on which there is broad fundamental agreement is diversity: the fight
for pluralism has produced a high degree of tolerance in Dutch society and widespread
interest in a broad range of cultural patterns.
Arts Management Newsletter No. 75 (October 2007)
The third important point is that cultural policy is based on the quality principle
The fourth and final principle of Dutch cultural policy is the government’s resolve to
avoid issues of ‘cultural politics’, a principle which involves certain paradoxes. The
government has to be selective if it is to fulfill its ‘civilizing’ role, but at the same time
it must not, and does not want to, make value judgments. To avoid this dilemma The
Ministry delegates the business of selection to an advisory board: The minister asks
for expert advice before making a decision, the so called Raad voor Cultuur. (Based on
quotes from “Cultural Policy in the Netherlands”)
The Ministry of Education, Culture and Science (OCW) supports arts organizations on
a 4 year basis. The Ministry is advised by the Raad voor Cultuur (council for culture),
who advises on general art policies, artistic quality, and the budget of the art organizations.
The cabinet (and parliament) makes final decisions on all recommendations,
However in practice, the advice is almost always taken where content and quality are
concerned. The cabinet doesn’t decide on artistic quality, but they can deviate from
the advice on administrative, financial and policy recomendations. Project funding is
delegated to seperate funds for venues, companies, visual arts etc. The Project Funds
are supported by the Ministry on advice of the ‘Raad voor Cultuur’.
The Ministry collaborates closely with local and regional governments in so called
‘covenants’, which are four year agreemens on how the different governments support
the regularly funded arts. All advice on art applications come from ‘peer committees’
on th national as well as the regional level. The final decision is always made by government
officials and politicians.
The system is currently under review. The Raad voor Cultuur has recently changed
and now has a general council that is mostly concerned with general policies and priorities,
and several committees of experts that advise on the regular funding. Further
changes are to be expected. One of the changes will be that most of the organizations
who now receive funding from the Ministry will have to apply to the project funds for
their support. Those funds will then differentiate in funding. They will be able to give
project funding, as well as 1, 2 or 3 years funding. Concerns that arise from this
change are the lack of a national overview and lack of continuity for a lot of the now
regularly funded organizations.
An article by Sabine Preuss
Details: http://www.culturalpolicies.net/web/netherlands.php
![<!--[sitename]-->](http://www.laculture.info/themes/SeaCulture/images/logo-92.png)



